Media ignore Catholic League’s bigotry; harassed feminist bloggers pay the price
|
Posted by Guest Blogger February 15th, 2007 |
By Guest Blogger Tedra Osell
More and more, what happens online, in the world of blogs, spills over into newspapers and National Public Radio: the “mainstream media,” as traditional news sources have come to be known. Example: the recent blog dustup over John Edward’s hiring–then firing, then rehiring, then accepting the resignations of–two women to run his campaign blog. Amanda Marcotte, best known for her blog Pandagon, was hired as Edward’s “Blogmistress” on January 30 and announced her resignation on February 12 . Melissa McEwan, better known online as Shakespeare’s Sister, worked as a technical advisor on Edward’s blog from January 31 to February 13.
During their tenures, both women were attacked by a range of right-wing critics. Michelle Malkin criticized Marcotte’s “foul-mouthed nutroots diatribes” [sic] and “lunatic blogging” and–erroneously–claimed that Marcotte had deliberately deleted a post (about the Duke rape case) that had been lost in a technical mishap. Malkin’s subsequent correction, “Looks like Marcotte’s Katrina post is actually still available to the public here under a different URL. My bad. Or rather, John Edwards’ bad. Because it’s even worse for the Edwards campaign that its blogmaster left crackpot posts like that one up and hired her anyway,” is buried two-thirds of the way down the page of an earlier post about Bill O’Reilly. Later, Malkin also posted a bizarre video spoofing one of Marcotte’s Pandagon essays.
National Review Online’s editor, Katherine Jean Lopez declared Marcotte anti-Catholic for Marcotte’s–correct–assertion that the concept of limbo is one that the Church itself has abandoned, and cited the subtitle of a Pandagon post, “FAQ on the Catholic Church’s ‘Crazy’ Teachings About Birth Control” without acknowledging or even seeming to recognize the deliberately ironic use of scare quotes around “crazy.”
Bill Donohue of the Catholic League called Marcotte and McEwan “two anti-Catholic vulgar trash-talking bigots,” for (among other things) letting the question of whether Limbo is official church teaching drop (”it’s going to be bad PR for the church, so you can sort of see why the Pope is dragging ass.”) (Marcotte) and for pointing out that “some of Christianity’s most prominent leaders—including the Pope—regularly speak out against gay tolerance” (McEwan).
Donohue’s criticisms, in particular, caught the attention of both the New York Times and the Washington Post, prompting Edwards to issue a brief statement distancing himself from both Marcotte’s and McEwan’s former blogging while reiterating his faith in the two women’s professional abilities.
Nonetheless, Marcotte and McEwan were gone within a week. Donohue’s accusations of anti-Catholic bias seem to have been the catalyst, suggesting that the religious right’s political power continues to play a significant role in our electoral process. The influence of religion on the Bush presidency has been well-established, though Bush’s recent troubles have raised questions about whether the religious right will continue to be an important part of the Republican base. The Marcotte/McEwan affair suggests that Democrats, too, are subject to pressure from, and prone to cowtowing to, the religious right.
This is a troubling development. Both Marcotte’s and McEwan’s supposed “anti-Catholic” writings were, in fact, strongly-worded condemnations of the Catholic Church’s position on abortion and birth control–political, as well as religious, issues targeting the institution, not individual Catholics. Donohue’s determination to link the two women in his broad-based attacks strongly suggests that his underlying concern is not anti-Catholicism per se, but rather feminism. Marcotte and McEwan have very different voices and were doing different jobs for Edwards. They have only one thing in common: both are well-known feminist bloggers.
The misogny of Donohue’s attack, in particular, seems not to be lost on readers who wrote to Amanda, calling her a “stupid bitch,” telling her that she “just needs a good fucking from a real man!” or that “i don’t particularly want to have sex with you but i would like a blow job,” and explaining that
after reading your vile screed against Catholics and the Holy Spirit, I just had to see what you looked like. (I envisioned you eyebrow-less, with no visible pupils, and a blank, dead stare.) I see I was correct about the blank, dead stare, but other than that you’re not too bad. I then thought maybe you were mad at God (and by proxy Catholics) for making you ugly, but now I’m figuring you’re just mad at him for making you a woman.
Donohue’s diatribes seem to have been the turning point that led to both Edward’s statement and the women’s resignations. His political power rests on his use of Catholicism as a tool for a long record of politically-motivated accusations of “anti-Catholicism.” Particularly disturbing is how corporate media reprinted Donohue’s attacks without much mention of his record of bigotry-fueled, politically-motivated rants. He has attempted to bully the Democratic National Committee into distancing itself from Catholics for a Free Choice, a pro-choice Catholic organization. He falsely claimed that the Pope never declared the Iraq war unjust and declared that Catholics voting for John Kerry–himself a Catholic–were “cooperating in evil,” according to Media Matters. In 2006, during the Iraq war, he referenced a Turkish film to support his claim that “people don’t trust the Muslims when it comes to liberty, because they will abuse it. In this country, we prize freedom of religion. They abhor it.” He asked an Asian student, “I want to know, why don’t you have a sense of humor about gook jokes?” during a 2002 debate on Phil Donahue’s short-lived MSNBC show.
Donohue’s use of Catholicism as a cloak for his politics extends beyond specific social and political issues, though, to a broader animus against liberalism generally, including liberal Catholics. He told the Today Show that the abuse of children by priests is “a homosexual scandal, not a pedophilia scandal” and later claimed that “It’s homosexuals” who are responsible for the abuse. He has gone after Joan Osborne, a lapsed Catholic and a bisexual, for her song “One of Us,” about a human god–this despite the fact that Christ’s incarnation is central to Catholic belief. Similarly, he published a booklet labelling the film Dogma, by Kevin Smith (a practicing Catholic), “anti-Catholic.” His campaign against the television show Nothing Sacred–a show for which Jesuits were hired as advisors–helped get the show pulled. When journalist Bill Moyers characterized the Bush administration’s position on abortion rights as “the power of the state to force pregnant women to give up control over their own lives,” Donohue attacked Moyers as anti-Catholic: “Moyers may be a minister, but at the end of the day he’s scared to death of religion.”
Donohue’s prejudice against “liberal” Hollywood frequently involves coded (and not so coded) attacks on Jews and gays. “Who really cares what Hollywood thinks?” he asks. “All these hacks come out there. Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular.” (MSNBC’s Scarborough Country, 12/8/2004). Moreover,”there are people in Hollywood, not all of them, but there are some people who are nothing more than harlots” who “will do anything for the buck. . . . If you asked them to sodomize their own mother in a movie, they would do so, and they would do it with a smile on their face” (MSNBC’s Scarborough Country, 2/09/2006).
Echidne of the Snakes, also a WIMN’s Voices blogger, has compiled additional examples of Donohue’s bigoted rants against the anti-Catholic liberals he sees everywhere he looks.
Despite his frequent appearances on MSNBC, Bill Donohue’s outrageousness is a good sign that he is not a representative American Catholic. And yet, the corporate media fails to recognize or report on Donohue’s fringe status, giving the impression that The Catholic League is a mainstream Catholic organization. This is an inexcusable omission; Donohue’s own statements show him to be a bigot and a far-right bully who is not above bashing fellow Catholics whose politics differ from his own. As Frances Kissling, herself a frequent target of Donohue’s, explained in Salon on Tuesday, “the glee with which he has gone after [Marcotte and McEwan] marks him as an abuser.”
From her mouth to God’s ears. Apparently the papers of record aren’t listening.
Guest Blogger Tedra Osell is the author of the popular blog Bitch Ph.D. She is currently on leave from a university position in Canada, and using this year to expand her freelancing from online to print publications.
February 16th, 2007 13:43
Come on Tedra. While you can (and should) worry about the misogyny of her many critics, Amanda is hardly the victim you play her up to be. Nothing said to her, or about her, has been any more misogynistic than the regular stream of misandry that permeates her every post. If anyone is an abuser, she is.
and–erroneously–claimed that Marcotte had deliberately deleted a post (about the Duke rape case) that had been lost in a technical mishap
Amanda claimed herself that she replaced the post deliberately. I believe the telling words are “I’m deleting it”.
The post itself clearly condemned those boys on the basis of their race, sex, and class. There’s just no denying it.
February 16th, 2007 14:06
I don’t see how that’s relevant; “I know you are, but what am I?” isn’t much of a defense. And it surely has nothing to do with Donohue’s attack on McEwan.
February 16th, 2007 14:27
I agree. Donohue’s attack has been egregious with it’s usual parts delusion and hysteria. I’m not defending him or the other usual suspects. I have a special black place in my heart for those like Donohue, Reilly, and Marcotte.
I’m not very familiar with McEwan’s writing, but yeah, it looks like she went down with Amanda’s ship.
February 17th, 2007 06:34
[…] You know you’re doing something right when the right wing noise machine paints a target on your back. Having spent two weeks getting harassed and hounded by right wing nuts intent on separating me from my job with the John Edwards campaign, returning to this thought — that I must be doing something right — was the only thing that kept my spirits high. […]
June 9th, 2009 14:48
Percocet withdrawal symptoms.
Buy percocet online no prescription. Gereric names for percocet 5 325. Percocet. Percocet dependency.
January 3rd, 2012 15:35
Very interesting info !Perfect just what I was searching for! “Charity is injurious unless it helps the recipient to become independent of it.” by John Davidson Rockefeller, Sr..
January 4th, 2012 00:19
I’ve observed that in the world these days, video games are definitely the latest rage with kids of all ages. Periodically it may be impossible to drag your son or daughter away from the games. If you want the best of both worlds, there are lots of educational activities for kids. Good post.
January 6th, 2012 18:44
Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to give it a look. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Fantastic blog and amazing style and design.
January 8th, 2012 01:53
I love what you guys are up too. This kind of clever work and reporting! Keep up the terrific works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to blogroll.
January 8th, 2012 06:14
Nice blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Thank you
January 10th, 2012 11:44
Great website. Plenty of useful information here. I’m sending it to several friends ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you for your effort!
January 11th, 2012 06:41
We want to make sure you thank you for those results you’ve place making this approach website. I’m in hopes the equivalent high-grade website content right from you will on the long term also. Actually any extremely creative making skills comes with encouraged others to generate my student’s website at this time. Actually all the weblog is normally growing the country’s wings fast. Any write down is normally a great occasion from it.
January 12th, 2012 11:46
Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a completely different subject but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Wonderful choice of colors!
January 13th, 2012 04:16
LOL I laughed so hard!
January 13th, 2012 04:43
Great news it is surely. My father has really been awaiting for the update.
January 13th, 2012 05:21
I’ve also been thinking the very same idea myself recently. Delighted to see an individual on the same wavelength! Nice article.
January 13th, 2012 05:39
Thanks very much for this great post,this is exactly the type of blog that will keep me returning to read your updates
January 13th, 2012 08:09
And why do you think so?
January 13th, 2012 13:12
Wonderful work! This is the type of info that should be shared around the web. Shame on Google for not positioning this post higher!
January 13th, 2012 15:07
Another awesome post! Definitely can’t wait for more!
January 14th, 2012 05:55
I request more people would write sites like this that are as a matter of fact constructive to read. With all the fluff floating almost on the web, it is rare to look over a position like yours instead.
January 16th, 2012 04:52
I’m really loving the theme/design of your weblog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A couple of my blog readers have complained about my site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any tips to help fix this issue?
January 18th, 2012 02:42
Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything. But just imagine if you added some great images or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this website could certainly be one of the greatest in its niche. Great blog!
January 19th, 2012 11:59
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your blog. You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Many thanks!
January 20th, 2012 05:14
Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my readers would value your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.
January 20th, 2012 11:03
Sehr guter Artikel, gibts irgendwo einen Google+-Button?
January 21st, 2012 12:08
You are my inspiration, I have few web logs and infrequently run out from post
. “Truth springs from argument amongst friends.” by David Hume.
January 22nd, 2012 19:06
Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.
January 26th, 2012 07:05
I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100% positive. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Kudos
January 26th, 2012 07:05
Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Firefox. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The layout look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Kudos
January 26th, 2012 07:18
Hiya! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My blog addresses a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Superb blog by the way!
January 26th, 2012 16:23
Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to take a look. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and amazing design and style.
January 27th, 2012 09:39
I’ve read some just right stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how much attempt you place to create this sort of excellent informative site.
January 27th, 2012 18:59
That’s a great post. Thank you so much.
January 29th, 2012 20:18
Usually I don’t read post on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very compelled me to take a look at and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thank you, very great post.
January 31st, 2012 16:06
I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my web site