home
WIMN’s Voices: A Group Blog on Women, Media, AND…

Jackasses on Sotomayor

lflanderss Icon Posted by Laura Flanders

June 4th, 2009

OK, let’s get this right: Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is making the rounds of the Capitol this week and some jackasses are still saying she has to explain her “wise Latina” comment?

In a 2001 speech Sotomayor said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

It’s been a week that the quote has been out there and, for just as long, the question’s been waiting to be answered: A better conclusion about what subject?

Does Sotomayor believe that Latina judges are ipso facto smarter? That’s what her right-wing critics want her much-mangled quote to mean. But smarter about what? The price of beans? The weather? What two and two add up to?

Not exactly. While the money-media have spent the week making the comment “controversial” (and then calling it that), the non-profit media watch group FAIR (where I once worked) looked at the transcript and they report (drum-roll):

“The topic under discussion was race and gender discrimination. Talking about judging such cases- Sotomayor argued that the experience of facing discrimination might lead to a better decision about discrimination and she pointed out: ‘Let us not forget that until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case.’

On the moon maybe it’s different – or in the privacy of your kitchen — but out here in the actual, lived USA – white males have been the norm (originally white, not-Irish or Italian or German-males). All “others” have had a different experience. A different experience – not of snow or rain or the price of beans – but of discrimination.

In a week that saw the killing of an off duty police officer by an another police officer in New York, and the killing of a women’s doctor in Wichita, it’s hard to believe that anyone in their right mind would disagree with Sotomayor.

The New York shooter took the victim for a criminal at least in part because the victim was a black man.

Women’s lives are not the same. The assassination of the country’s eighth abortion provider brought out of the margins and into the media the reality that women seeking legal care and the people who look after them are still, after decades, subject to the kind of daily harassment, vandalism and threats that no corporate CEO would tolerate for a weekend.

In a week like this, it’s hard to believe that anyone in their right mind would argue that to mention difference in America is to be racist — or that to have experienced discrimination might make one smarter about it. But what am I saying? All those “right” minds are the problem. Right minds would rather that we pretend we’re all already equal, because then we’ll stop working to make it that way.

Jackass.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, public television and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com.

2 Responses to “Jackasses on Sotomayor”

  1. Martha
    June 19th, 2009 11:02
    1

    When you use “cackle” to describe Hillary Clinton’s laugh, don’t expect to be taken seriously. Laura Flanders did that in February 2008 on KPFA, the night of Barack and Hillary’s debate. She also forgot to tell listeners that, ‘unbiased analyst’ that she allegedly was, she’d already endorsed Barack Obama.
    I used to respect Ms. Flanders’ opinions and enjoyed Bush Women. Now I realize she’s built her career on sexist attacks but aimed at the right wing.
    In 2008, people including Ms. Flanders used those same attacks on Hillary.
    I do not forget.
    I do not trust people like that again ever.

  2. Keesha
    June 19th, 2009 20:21
    2

    Agree with Martha. And think if you’re a not a member of a political party, you don’t endorse during a primary. Flanders didn’t vote for Al Gore or for John Kerry because she’s not a Democrat. She’s not an independent either. Her politics are like her father’s and her grandfather’s. And she’s not a member of the Democratic Party. She needs to stick with her own political party. And she’s fooling herself if she thinks most American women on the left listen to her anymore. She attacked Hillary Clinton in the most vicious and sexist language and it is not forgotten and it will never be forgotten. I’m glad her radio show is over and look forward to hearing that her cheaply made TV show went out of business as well.

Leave a Reply