MTV’s “Juvies”
|
|
Posted by Silja J.A. Talvi February 10th, 2007 |
The popularity of one of the longest-running shows on television, COPS, says a lot about how fascinated Americans continue to be with “law and order,” and the sensational aspects of what happens when people suffer from mental illness, get addicted to drugs, abuse themselves and others, and/or take out their misdirected rage (including misogyny, homophobia, and racism) in any number of ways.
I actually find it nearly impossible to watch that show for more than a few minutes at as time because I’ve already seen so much of that stuff in my life, up close and personal, and so find it rather nauseating to participate in the spectacle of it all. (Although I continue to wonder, with my dark sense of humor, about why nearly every man on that show has his shirt off when he’s taken down. Is it some kind of primal reaction to threat? Who knows! One can only speculate … )
A new show about the criminal justice system on cable television, however, truly has piqued my interest.
MTV’s Juvies, represents the first time that most viewers will have been introduced to the reality of day-to-day life in American juvenile halls.
The kids on this show are brought in for a variety of “offenses,” including, in the case of many of the girls, for the “crime” of running away from home. It’s hearbreaking to see the cases of the girls and boys who are trying to liberate themselves, psychologically and physically, from clearly dysfunctional homes. Sadly, some of them are abandoned by their parents once they are finally arrested and placed in juvie. Most of the other kids are in on petty offenses. Others have been ratted out or abandoned by friends who ran off the scene once something bad happened.
This isn’t so much a question of “innocence” or “guilt” but of the kinds of situations that many teenagers get into when parents are not a regular, healthy presence in their lives, or they get into the mix with other kids for whom that is the case. Sometimes, their behavior is just based on that kind of teenage, “indestructible” hubris that adolescent psychologists and psychiatrists have heem writing and talking about for quite some time. There are lots of ways to “treat” that kind of issue, but locking up a kid is hardly at the top of anybody’s list–that is, anybody who actually understands that this degree of punishment tends to excarerbate, not improve, a kid’s already skewed and/or unhealthy mindset.
But what the show actually excels at, whether it intends to or not, is showing the sheer monotony, Orwellian sterility, and ultimately dehumanizing process of juvenile detention. We watch children being shuffled off to court hearings in arm and leg shackles, all walking with their heads down, doing the penguin-like walk that hand-and-ankle-cuffing bring about.
Visits from parents are a particularly hard thing to watch, because the parents are allowed no physical contact whatsoever. A violation gets the kid eight hours in isolation. No hand holding allowed because “the parents might slip something to the kids.”
These are children. Need I say again? Children, who are at a pivotal point in their adolescent development, being locked down and treated as though they were hardened adult criminals.
Yes, they’re in trouble, to varying degrees. But in the absence of intensive intervention, counseling services, group support, what we see is the harsh, brutal truth of what most of our juvenile detention centers have “evolved” into: Cold, concrete rooms with bare-bones mattresses; page after page after page of rules; humiliating scrub downs with Lysol and body searches; and severe punishment in isolation if someone “talks back” too much.
Does all of this scare the kids? Of course. You can see the shame and humiliation on the faces of even the “toughest” of kids. But once we’re allowed to listen in on some of their conversations, we get to see them for who they are. Victims and survivors. Kids who pray together before court hearings. Kids who simply want to have healthy relationships with their parents, but can’t figure out how to do so. Misfits and rebels, in some cases, who just want to be left alone and express themselves, although they may be doing so currently in unhealthy ways.
If you haven’t seen this show, I actually recommend you check it out. Check out some of the comments and judgments made by the primary judge and prosecutor, and check out the dynamics between these kids and the people incarcerating them. At this point, the only woman who deserves commendation of any kind is the intake officer, who actually sees and responds to the kid in front of her without judgment, and, so far, without apparent regard to the color of their skin.
To be clear: I don’t recommend this show because it represents how we should be treating kids, but I recommend it so that you can see how inhumane the whole process of juvenile incarceration has become.

February 13th, 2007 22:26
Thanks once again Silja for shining a light on the dark realities of incarceration.
February 20th, 2007 08:45
Juvies is not only a great way to teach us kids, but to kind of ‘warn’ us. Lets put it this way, after watching that show, i really had to think about the type of kids i was hanging out with. Do they do drugs? Do they pressure me? No and no. Before when i was living in a tough situation i was one of those kids. I’m happy that Juvies is definatly opening eyes of other teens. -Taylor
February 21st, 2007 03:20
[…] MTV’s “Juvies” - WIMN’s Voices: A Group Blog on Women, Media, AND… Hat tip to Rachel. “what the show actually excels at, whether it intends to or not, is showing the sheer monotony, Orwellian sterility, and ultimately dehumanizing process of juvenile detention. We watch children being shuffled off to court hearings in ar (tags: tv realitytv prison) […]
February 21st, 2007 11:26
I work for the juvenile justice system, and I believe that “Juvies” isn’t doing enough. First of all, they reenact the crime from the kid’s point-of-view, which, I’ve learned from experience, is only truthful about 99% of the time.
And when the viewer is first introduced to the world of the detention center and sees the “cold, concrete rooms with bare-bones mattresses; page after page after page of rules; humiliating scrub downs with Lysol and body searches; and severe punishment in isolation if someone ‘talks back’ too much” the average person doesn’t realize that it’s all there for a reason.
The bare rooms and the disinfect is because the child is entering a population with people who have abused drugs and may have infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis. The isolation for “talking back” is for the kid’s own safety. Imagine if that angry kid walked up to another child who was also angry or even emotionally disturbed. Isolation isn’t to punish the kid, it’s so the child can calm down.
If the child leaves the detention center and it’s determined he/she’s a danger to the community and that they need to be a secure facility or in a group home, then that child will receive counseling, an education, and lessons on how to cope with his/her environment once they are sent back home.
To make a long story short(er), don’t believe everything you see on TV.
(Especially if it’s on MTV.)
March 9th, 2007 09:40
Thanks for the critique of the show, and also thanks to Angel H. for bringing in a JCO’s perspective. Does anyone know anything about how this show is actually getting produced? Like how they get the kids’ permissions? They often show film of the kids arriving- but how could kids consent to be filmed before they even arrive?
I am suspicious of the crime re-enactments as well, but not b/c I necessarily think they’re false. I just worry that it’s voyeuristic, that it possibly romanticizes the crime, and that it definately defines that kid by the crime he or she has been charged with. That seems really harmful to me!
If anyone knows anything about the production of the show please tell me about it at wendyhinshaw@gmail.com
March 14th, 2007 13:50
Angel, I really do hear what you’re saying, having visited juvenile detention centers and seeing the horror show for myself.
I’m not a fan of the re-enactments at all. That’s done for the sake of sensationalizing.
However, for many American viewers, this is likely to be the first time they have any idea of what a juvenile detention center really looks like (and this is tame compared to some), and how they serve as little more than hostile, soul-sucking holding pens. For that, and for the access granted, I think it’s better than having nothing at all airing on the subject.
Wendy, legally all of the teens would not only have to consent to having their images and names broadcast, but their parents or guardians would have to agree, as well. It’s quite possible, however, that the producers would be rolling tape before securing permission, and then just using the footage that is signed off on; legal, sure, but still at least somewhat ethically problematic from my standpoint as a journalist.