home
WIMN’s Voices: A Group Blog on Women, Media, AND…

Oh, hell no. Fox wonders if women with “axes to grind” can “effectively rule society”

jpozners Icon Posted by Jennifer L Pozner

July 13th, 2007

How many guesses as to what their answer will be?

It’s not like I can be shocked by anything reality TV-related anymore, but I can certainly predict exactly what new shows will be like as soon as I read the promo blurbs. And a new reality show called “When Women Rule the World,” coming soon from Fox and Rocket Science Laboratories (which brought us such craptacular concoctions of misogyny including Joe Millionaire, Married By America, Temptation Island and Trading Spouses: Meet Your New Mommy), promises to be overtly political, anti-feminist backlash fare:

What if it was “a woman’s world”? What if women made ALL the decisions? If men were their obedient subjects?

These questions and more will be explored when a group of strong, educated, independent women, tired of living in a man’s world and each with a personal axe to grind, rule over a group of unsuspecting men used to calling the shots on WHEN WOMEN RULE THE WORLD.

The unscripted series will reveal how women and men react in a world where women are in charge and men are subservient, and each gender’s ability to adapt to a new social order will be put to the test.

The participants will be brought to a remote, primitive location where the women will have the opportunity to “rule” as they build a newly formed society – one where there is no glass ceiling and no dressing to impress. For the men, their worlds of power and prestige are turned inside-out and upside-down. And for these women, turnabout is fair play!

In order to win, the men must accede to the women’s every demand, 24/7. Here, women command and men obey. Over the series’ duration, the men will be eliminated by the women until one last man is standing.

How will the men react? How will the women treat the men? Can women effectively rule society? Will the men learn what life is like for some women in today’s world? Will this new society be a Utopia or a hell on earth? And in the end, who will be man enough to succeed in the new social order?

PRODUCTION COMPANY
Rocket Science Laboratories, Inc.

Some quick translations, decoded via Jenn’s Trusty Reality TV-Speak to Plain English Dictionary:

  • “women with… a personal axe to grind” = women portrayed as the nasty, bitchqueen Feminazi of Rush Limbaugh’s design (though the women themselves won’t actually be feminists)
  • “unsuspecting men used to calling the shots” = men cast specifically because they are likely to say regressive, patronizing, offensive things about women, and possibly prone toward behaving in domineering, controlling, maybe even abusive ways
  • “men are subservient” = feminism, and the idea of eliminating external barriers to women’s equality, won’t result in equity for women but denigration, submission and lack of opportunity for men
  • “each gender’s ability to adapt to a new social order will be put to the test” = traditional gender roles are innate, and this “social experiment” will result in chaos as both women and men have no idea how to handle reversal of their God-given roles of dominance and submission
  • “a remote, primitive location” = flashback to Bill Maher being boiled in a cauldron in Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death
  • “a newly formed society – one where there is no glass ceiling and no dressing to impress” = these are the only two forms of societal oppression women face… oh, and when the women choose to wear the revealing outfits the producers provide for them, they’ll prove once and for all that women prefer to use their feminine wiles to get what they want, so those teeny-tiny Ally McBeal-esque micro-minis that women wear on reality shows like The Apprentice and such are not at all trivializing
  • “men[’s] worlds of power and prestige are turned inside-out” = up is down, night is day, cats and dogs living together - total anarchy! It’s unnatural, I tell you - unnatural!!!!!
  • “How will the women treat the men?” = like the dogs they are… which is why women shouldn’t be given leadership roles in the real world - they wouldn’t be able to handle it
  • “How will the men react?” = Like any caged animals would
  • “Can women effectively rule society?” = NO!!!
  • “Will this new society be a Utopia or a hell on earth?” = That’s an easy one…
  • “who will be man enough to succeed” = a man, ‘natch!

Hey, that was fun!

How ’bout this — do you have other translations of reality TV-speak (dialog transcribed verbatim from reality shows, lines from networks promo materials, quotes from producers and directors in the entertainment press, etc.)? If so, send ‘em to me at info[at]wimnonline[dot]org, or post them in the comments below. Perhaps I’ll make it a regular WIMN’s Voices feature… or maybe even add this “dictionary” as a feature to the “Fun With Media Literacy” chapter I’m going to be writing in my book, Bachelors, Bridezillas and Beautiful Corpses: Unraveling Reality TV’s Twisted Fairy Tales.

By the way, wish me luck — I began shopping the book proposal around yesterday. About fifteen publishers will likely have the proposal by the beginning of next week.

[Thanks to Jessica for the link to Fox’s promo site.]

9 Responses to “Oh, hell no. Fox wonders if women with “axes to grind” can “effectively rule society””

  1. Echidne
    July 13th, 2007 11:28
    1

    The scariest nightmares of conservative men brought to life! Watch monster women bite off the penises of brave male warriors! Watch women making a mess of all of it, reduced to weeping estrogen-poisoned blobs of jelly! Watch the return of caveman patriarchy! Bang! Get that! That was my truncheon on your itty-bitty female head. See me drag you back into the cave by your hair! Me the boss!

    Can women rule the world? I have no idea, but men don’t do a very good job of that, either. We have loads of evidence on that. Interesting, though, that Fox is picking a scenario that few women have ever suggested: Matriarchy. Feminists are all about equality, not about reversing the power relationships. But Fox is all about male dominance, and this show is intended to prop that up.

    That’s from my post on the topic.

  2. Peter
    July 13th, 2007 11:34
    2

    It’s like Fox just wants to give you another chapter in your book!

  3. jpozner
    July 13th, 2007 11:45
    3

    Everyone should click over to Echidne’s post… she vents a little spleen in an ultra-satisfying way…

    Peter: you’re right. This book almost writes itself. And Fox certainly helps (hurts) — between this show and the new “Anchorwoman,” that hideous “bimbos in broadcasting” BS show that’s going to air in August, that network provides a show for every chapter.

  4. mspencer
    July 13th, 2007 16:35
    4

    Cheerful thought for the day: There wouldn’t be a backlash if we weren’t actually making progress and threatening Them.

    That said, I predict at least one dominatrix outfit and one woman dropping out because she falls for one of the men and realizes she’d rather be “feminine”….I also predict a participant in a past reality series will be a contestant on the new show. Omarosa, perhaps?

  5. Truthsmack
    July 13th, 2007 20:41
    5

    Hey Jen- would you like some bean dip? It would go well with the many, many chips you have on your shoulder.

  6. jpozner
    July 13th, 2007 21:36
    6

    Miranda, that’s hilarious. I bet you’re right on w/your predictions.

    As for you, “truth smack” (way to keep it classy with that name, by the way), seems like you’re the one who’s chowing down on the chips, dude. I provide a handy-dandy dictionary as aternoon amusement, and you post a lame attempt at an insult without actually providing an argument or a point. Defensive, much?

  7. Just Mike
    July 15th, 2007 15:05
    7

    The problem with watching (or TiVoing) the show, interesting for the train wreck that we all know it to be, is that when it pulls in big ratings, it will prompt an avalanche of pretenders. So I will only keep up with the show through the lens of this site. And yes, your translations/predictions are spot on.

    More interesting will be the second season, Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy, where the “normal” and “aberrant” tribes square off against each other. TV at it’s 21st Century best!

  8. Jessica B. Burstrem
    July 23rd, 2007 07:09
    8

    Hey Jennifer, do you discuss the issue of appropriate maternity in TRADING SPACES in your book? I might like to see that part, as it’s relevant to my own work. Please e-mail me. Best, j

  9. Joey Bardney
    January 3rd, 2010 04:15
    9

    I have found that buying tickets online actually save me a lot of money.

Leave a Reply